Posts filed under 'clean technology'
India’s solar industry eyes huge rural opportunity
| Stumble it! | Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Facebook
I was at ICORE 2009, a renewable energy conference organized by Solar Energy Society of India (SESI). This year’s focus: Renewable Energy for Rural Development.
I heard industry leaders talk passionately about potential for solar to truly bring electricity to rural communities and catalyze grassroots social and economic development. Plenty of discussion circled around industry’s demand for adequate support, recognition of its potential, “leveling the playing field” and inclusion on policy discussions. Overall, the energetic conversaion between industry and government reps was indicative of an evolving sector keen not to miss growth opportunities during a time that many see as the inflection point.
The following observations are not new, but are notable because they were made by industry representatives and collectively signal that India’s solar players “get it.”
1. There are more villages and rural population without electricity or access to quality electricity than government statistics let on. The need is such that the entire “20 GW by 2020″ goal could be met by rural systems and hardly make a dent in demand. We need more aggressive goals.
2. Decentralized solar can more cost effectively make a difference than centralized multi-MW solar power plants because of the grid’s poor quality. Transmission losses are as high as 50-60% in some states where the need for rural power is greatest.
3. Government’s policy framework should recognize the above facts and incentivise rural electrification via decentralized solar deployment accordingly. Today it does not.
The hot button issue of the event clearly was about how central government should support both manufacturing and usage (including rural) of PV and solar thermal. The lively conversation between MNRE (Ministry of New and Renewable Energy) representatives and industry leaders bordered on an open negotiation.
The following were the broad themes in this regard.
1. Comparison with conventional energy sources, especially coal: It is wrong to compare solar with coal simply on upfront costs alone. Costs associated with fuel (coal), operation & maintenance, grid losses and cost of grid need to be accounted for. MNRE’s response was mixed. While acknowledging the need to devise “apples to apples” comparison, they maintained solar is costly and that their goal is to reduce costs for the consumer.
2. Consistent support for on-grid & off-grid solar power generation: Given the poor quality of the grid and significant hours in a day when the grid is “down,” government should provide consistent tarriff for solar energy produced & used irrespective of grid connection. MNRE’s reps were amenable to the idea and said this may require a certification mechanism via independent 3rd party entities that are able to verify useful electricity produced from distributed power generation.
3. Support for Indian manufacturers to compete, especially with Chinese manufacturers: Industry reps feel Indian goverment needs to do more to “level the playing field” for them to compete with Chinese companies, which apparently receive free land and very cheap capital from China’s government. MNRE reps gave a sneak peek into November announcements stating that “generous” support is on its way.
4. Anti-dumping / quality laws: As PV prices tumble, manufacturers are feeling the pinch. Some industry reps clearly were enraged by what they called “low quality, low cost” products entering India. MNRE indicated new quality certification programs will help here, but ultimately consumer should remain the decision maker.
Both MNRE directors and SESI officers repeatedly referred to an upcoming MNRE policy/tarrif announcement expected around November 15, 2009. I can’t wait to see its details!
In the next couple of posts, I will focus on the most interesting speakers/conversations of the event from my perspective.
Add comment October 13, 2009
Suzlon has aggressive plans for China
Suzlon, the Indian wind energy giant, had announced back in April that it secured 200 MW worth orders in China. But apparently that was just the beginning.
Just as China is seeking to tap into its wind energy potential, Suzlon has teamed up with the Bahranian bank Arcapita to form a JV to acquire London-based Honiton Energy Holdings. Honiton, it turns out, holds rights to develop major wind farms in five provinces including the wind-rich Inner Mongolia region. Currently, it intends to develop 1,650 MW wind farm capacity.
NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission), China’s economic planning agency, set a target of 10GW of installed wind power capacity by 2010. China had 5.9 GW at the end of 2007 according to GWEC’s 2007 report. Accounting for the 1,650MW that Honiton plans for 2010, that only leaves about 2.4 GW capacity yet to be spoken for.
I find that rather underwhelming because in 2007 alone China added 3.3 GW of new wind power capacity. GWEC predicts instead that China will have 50 GW of wind energy capacity by 2015, which is more in line with expectations that China will be the largest contributor to growth in wind power industry over next few years.
Expect to see more announcements of deals similar to Suzlon’s by other wind energy giants to enter the Chinese market. This is just the beginning. Indeed.
Add comment July 11, 2008
BBC Takes a Critical Look at Carbon Trading
With the backdrop of G8 + Developing Nations negotiations regarding green house gas emissions, the BBC and PRI put out two awesome episodes of the popular Changing World podcast.
Both focus on whether the UN’s Clean Development Mechanism aka CDM (born out of Kyoto Protocol) is achieving what it’s meant to do. For anyone interested in India, the first episode is a “must listen.” It’s especially relevant given the increased interest in CDM-related activity in India (see earlier post here).
I think the program is an excellent piece of journalism, that explains how CDM works and also gives equal airtime to supporters, critics, administrators and beneficiaries of the program. Just shows why carbon trading continues to generate interesting discussion. Enjoy!
Add comment July 9, 2008