India’s Electricity Transmission and Distribution Losses
July 16, 2008
| Stumble it! | Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Facebook
.
According to World Resources Institute (WRI), India’s electricity grid has the highest transmission and distribution losses in the world – a whopping 27%. Numbers published by various Indian government agencies put that number at 30%, 40% and greater than 40%. This is attributed to technical losses (grid’s inefficiencies) and theft.
Theft, in Delhi, accounts for 42% losses as per this BBC article. For those who don’t understand how power theft actually happens, the photograph in this The Hindu article is instructive. (Incredible. Never ceases to amaze me.)
By contrast, China apparently loses just 3% of it’s electricity to theft as part of 8% total power transmission losses. OECD countries’ transmission and distribution losses are just 7%.
Entry Filed under: Energy Distribution, energy. Tags: electricity theft, grid losses, india electricity, india grid power, power theft, transmission losses.
4 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Piyush Tiwari | August 31, 2008 at 12:48 am
It is indeed alarming to know the level of losses in Indian electricity and transmission business. These losses not only eat the revenues of the companies but also hinder the financing of future projects, which require huge capital, because of increased risk.
However, it would be worth knowing the categorization of technical and commercial losses that contribute to the total losses. The theft comes in the latter category. Majority of theft is happening because the line is open to theft! The pole and the wires are bare! The voltage is at lower level than transmission and thus useful to run the 240 V equipment. (Theft almost always occurs at 400V and 240V level and not on transmission levels). Not much of energy auditing is done in most of the state utilities. Long low tension (LT) line are being pulled to reach villages under much publicised government schemes. Low tension lines are many times over the High tension lines causing more technical I2R losses. Transformer are running at less than optimal efficiency when infact they should have the efficiency rate close to 99% since they do not have any moving part !
It’s a vicious circle. Theft is done when people are not willing to pay the high price of electricity. Power companies, as per the regulatory framework, are assured their 16% ROI in distribution business and hence, the most of the losses are again put back to the consumer with increase in tariff. It’s never the power companies which decide the tariff, it’s the regulator. Very few people realise this fact.
Mumbai has infact one of the best distribution network with only 2-3% losses in theft and around 10-11% AT&C (Agg Tec and Comm losses) losses. However, the major contributing factor has been the complete underground cable system making it difficult to tap and steal. Let’s take the case of Delhi. The BBC article pegs the losses at 40% for Delhi. Having some experience in 2 out of 3 power companies that operates in Delhi, post privatization the losses have actually come down from almost 60%+ to 30-35% ! That’s a huge saving for the government and citizen of Delhi as more power is going to the rightful owner thus decreasing the burden of purchasing short term power at higher rate! (Thats a really hot market right now. Captive power plants are minting money because of demand-supply curve getting royally skewed!) What caused this turnaround were the concentrated efforts of all the 3 private companies (NDPL, BSES Yamuna and BSES Rajdhani) that resulted into one of the best and most effective energy auditing practices adopted in India. Use of analytics had never been so effective before in this field. Electromechanical meters were changed to electronic meters amid huge protests. Consumer complained that electronic meter runs faster. That’s the perception! Their electromechanical meter got slow with age (moving part) and consumer are used to pay for the less number of units. Underground cables have been put wherever possible instead of overhead. How would you tap that!? Overhead conductors are now coming with a sheath.
Delhi has been a success story not only for the companies but also in the political circles where privatization is considered a dirty word. There seems to be no logic why the government discarded the Delhi privatization model after such a success and went for franchisee with a time frame of 8-10 years license. No company in its good mind would be willing to put much CAPEX and efforts to bring down the losses without having the surety of actually leveraging the profits, which aint possible in short time. Torrent is already having a hard time in Bhiwandi which it took as a franchisee and now Crompton Greaves is taking Nagpur. Interestingly enough, in Napur case, government opened only the residential and commercial circles for bidding while keeping the industrial region, which consumes the maximum power at highest rate without giving much headache, in their own kitty!
PS: Sorry for the long comment. Just could not manage to put in my thoughts in a line or two!
2.
ikohc | September 4, 2008 at 12:56 am
how do i copy the article
3.
Bhavika | April 26, 2009 at 1:00 am
excellent comment
4.
Madhav Shivpuri | August 27, 2009 at 12:01 am
Piyush, execellent and informative comment. If you have a blog/ article relating to power in India, I would like to read more.